Jan 15 2007

Labour giving criminals a break as they walk free from local jails

Worrying new figures expose scandal of convicted criminals being let out early

New analysis of Government statistics revealed that 954 criminals have been let out of prison before finishing their sentences across London since June, under Labour’s controversial new early release scheme. In Wormwood Scrubs, 239 criminals have been let out onto the streets.

Across the country, 11,000 criminals have already walked out of prison early under the ‘end of custody licence’ system, with an estimated 25,500 criminals to be let out over a full year. They include violent offenders and foreign nationals convicted of serious offences. The scheme was introduced because a shortage in prison places, thanks to a funding crisis caused by Gordon Brown.

Labour Ministers are now planning a new sentencing quango, which would, for the first time, link sentences to prison capacity, so that when jails are full, criminals could receive shorter sentences or not be sent to prison at all.

Bob Blackman said:
“By definition, being sent to prison means someone has committed a serious offence. Yet Labour is giving criminals a break, by letting them loose on Harrow’s streets.

“Serious crimes should be punished by a prison sentence, not least to protect the public. It is no wonder that violent crime has doubled under this Government when Gordon Brown is giving the culprits a ‘get out of jail’ card this Christmas. This is fundamentally wrong. Sentences should fit the crime, not this week’s prison capacity.”

Conservatives are calling for:

  • An immediate halt to the early release scheme, and the introduction of an emergency prison places programme using the savings from scrapping the flawed Identity Card scheme.
  • Doubling the sentencing powers of magistrates to 12 months and repealing any new restrictions on their ability to hand down suspended sentences.
  • Honesty in sentencing so that convicted criminals serve the minimum sentence handed down to them by the courts.
  • Sufficient prison capacity to hold all those sentenced by the courts – and reforming prison regimes to break the cycle of re-offending.

Notes to Editors

LABOUR Giving criminals a break

The Government is trying to deal with the continuing shortfall in prison places by watering down sentences and attempting to restrict the ability of courts to send offenders to prison.

  • The Criminal Justice & Immigration Bill, currently before the House of Commons, ends magistrates’ powers to impose a suspended sentence, and limits the period served in custody by offenders who breach their licence conditions to just 28 days.
  • The Government plans to restrict the use of its flagship Indeterminate Sentences for Public Protection Sentence for Public Protection (IPP). There will be a minimum tariff of two years below which Judges will no longer be able be impose an IPP. This would affect half the cases in which IPPs are currently imposed for threats to kill, arson, sexual assault, sexual activity with a child, and most cases of sexual assault on a child under 13.  The whole point of these sentences was to protect the public, ensuring that offenders could not be released until they were judged no longer to be a threat.  Now they will be released automatically.
  • A new Sentencing Commission will, for the first time, link sentences to resources, so that when jails are full, criminals could receive shorter sentences or not be sent to prison at all.

  • It appears that the End of Custody Licence scheme, under which 11,000 offenders have already been released from jail 18 days early, will now continue indefinitely – even though it was meant to be a temporary measure.  The Government expects to release 25,500 offenders early in a single year.


The Government has published figures showing the number of criminals that have been let out of prison early, under the Government’s early release scheme. The figures below show the number let out from June to October.

Source: Ministry of Justice, End of Custody Licence Statistics, December 2007.

Jan 14 2007

More Lottery funding for Harrow, and less Whitehall interference

Bob Blackman backs plans to increase funding for local good causes

Harrow East could benefit from an extra quarter of a million pounds in Lottery funding every year, under new proposals launched by Conservatives. Bob Blackman gave his backing to plans to reform the National Lottery, restoring its independence and increasing money for the good causes of sport, the arts, heritage and the local community. The Labour Government has diverted Lottery money away from these causes, including pouring £544 million of Lottery funds into the Millennium Dome.

Under the plans launched by David Cameron:

  • A National Lottery Independence Bill would free the Lottery from ministerial inference, return it to good causes and make it accountable to Parliament rather than the Government.
  • End the waste of Lottery funds going to dubious projects which undermine public confidence. All Lottery distributors would be required to take into account the reputation of the Lottery as a whole when deciding grants.
  • National Lottery distributors’ administration costs would be capped, and the savings ploughed back into good causes.
  • The way that Lottery tickets are taxed would be changed, moving away from a per-ticket tax to a gross profits tax on the Lottery operators. This would allow the operator more freedom to increase sales and therefore returns to good causes.
  • This package of measures could see an extra £182 million per year for grassroots sports, arts projects and the voluntary sector – equivalent to £280,000 per Parliamentary constituency, every year. This is enough money to pay for four grass pitches, two flood-lit outside tennis courts, or save an arts organisation which has experienced funding cuts by the Arts Council.

Bob Blackman said:

“Under Gordon Brown, Lottery money has been snatched from good causes by bureaucrats. The arts, sport, heritage and charities have all suffered. We need to give money back to local grassroots initiatives, and stop politicians in Whitehall interfering. I welcome these reforms, which could mean an extra quarter of a million pounds every year in Harrow East to improve quality of life.”
Notes to Editors


The National Lottery was established by the last Conservative Government to “enhance the life of our nation”. It was explicitly set up to support non-core areas of government expenditure which are none the less vital for the quality of the nation’s life. Since its establishment the Lottery has raised over £20 billion for good causes that would not otherwise have received funding. However, since 1998 the Labour Government has diverted £4 billion away from the good causes and into areas of Government responsibility.

  • National Lottery Independence: Conservatives will introduce a National Lottery Independence Bill to free the Lottery from ministerial inference, return it to the original good causes and make it accountable to Parliament rather than the government. This would champion that founding principle of ‘additionality’ – i.e. funds are spent in ways that are additional to the government’s own spending.

  • More money for good causes: These proposals could release an extra £182 million per year for good causes. The Big Lottery Fund distributes £630 million each year, with 84 per cent going to voluntary and community sector [VCS] projects. This means that 16 per cent or £101 million goes on non-VCS projects. We would stop the funding of non-VCS projects once existing commitments have been made, so freeing up £101 million. We calculate that £36 million can also be freed up through efficiency savings across the National Lottery distributors. An additional £45 million could be raised through the introduction of a Gross Profit Tax regime (according to calculations by Camelot and PricewaterhouseCoopers).

  • Accountability: Conservatives will end the wasting of Lottery funds on projects which undermine public confidence in it. We will ensure Lottery distributors follow a ‘reputational impact’ clause. All Lottery distributors would be required to take into account the reputation of the Lottery as a whole when deciding grants.

£182,000,000 divided by 646 Parliamentary constituencies (2005 election boundaries) equates to £281,734 extra for each constituency under the plans.

Jan 13 2007

Concern raised over tax collectors snooping on local homes in Harrow

Secret deal between tax inspectors & estate agents must be cancelled – Bob Blackman

Bob Blackman this week expressed his concern at news of a secret deal between the taxman and estate agents. It has been revealed that detailed information on 9 out of 10 house sales and rentals in Harrow is being collected and logged in a ‘Big Brother’ database to prepare for council revaluation tax hikes.

  • Estate agents and tax men plunder your data: Unsuspecting homeowners across Harroware putting their property on the market for sale or rental, without realising that the tax collectors will use it to plan for new council tax hikes. HM Revenue & Customs, which has lost millions of personal tax and benefit records, is systematically raiding estate agency records to build up a property database for its council tax inspectors. Rightmove holds 16 million property records, with millions of individual entries being updated every month.
  • Big Brother database invades privacy: People selling their home are not informed that information given to their estate agent, which is then passed to internet portal Rightmove Plc, is in turn passed on to the Government’s tax inspectors. Local estate agents in Harrowhave been kept in the dark about Rightmove’s actions.
  • Details on people’s homes: The personal property data being passed to the taxmen include internal and external photographs of the home, the number of bedrooms and bathrooms, conservatories, parking spaces, and particulars such as area, layout, style, features and other ‘value significant’ features. The Government claims that the Data Protection Act does not apply to information about people’s houses. HMRC’s council tax inspectors will instruct local councils to increase the council tax on these homes.

Bob Blackman said:
“We already knew that Gordon Brown’s tax inspectors have recklessly lost the tax records of millions of law-abiding citizens. Now the same people are disregarding data protection rules to build up a chilling database of every home in the country.

“Residents across Harrow will be alarmed that detailed information on 9 out of 10 house sales and rentals is being passed secretly from estate agents to tax collectors, without public consent.

“Gordon Brown must cancel this deal immediately. Only Conservatives will stop this data plundering of people’s private homes, end Brown’s stealth tax revaluation and abolish state inspectors’ rights of entry into our homes.”

Notes to editors


Gordon Brown’s tax inspectors, HM Revenue & Customs, on behalf of its council tax inspectors (the Valuation Office Agency, an arm of HMRC) have signed a deal with internet property company Rightmove.co.uk Plc, which holds the property data from almost all of England’s estate agents. Yet using the Freedom of Information Act, Conservatives have forced the Government to publish the contract

In Rightmove’s own words, their property database now includes details of 9 out of 10 property sales, and 20,000 estate agents.

“More than 90% of all UK Estate Agents choose to be members of Rightmove… That’s well over 20,000 agents & developers from Land’s End to John O’ Groats which enables us to provided users with an unrivalled and outstanding choice of property” (Rightmove website).

“The Rightmove AVM database contains unprecedented quantities of property data – one of the reasons we believe it is the UK’s most accurate AVM. There are over 16 million property records comprising surveyors’ valuations, Land Registry records and properties which have been on the Rightmove website.”


The HMRC contract shows how Gordon Brown’s council tax inspectors are raiding the massive database held by Rightmove to conduct a council tax revaluation by stealth. The move is a secret one, with the Rightmove being legally gagged from telling the public.

Terms of the contract revealed

  • The agreement is a 34 month contract, from 1 June 2005, with an option to extend for a further 12 months (from March 2008) The contract was signed by HM Revenue & Customs, on behalf of the Valuation Office Agency, with Rightmove.co.uk Plc (Agreement between HMRC and Rightmove, p.3).
  • To exercise the 12 month extension option, the Government must approach Rightmove before end of the 34 month period (p.18). The prices of the service may be increased in the extra 12 month extension, subject to negotiation (p.19).
  • Rightmove is bound by the Official Secrets Acts, and all Rightmove staff must sign a confidentiality agreement over the contract (p.13). Rightmove is not allowed to make any public statement over its work, without the prior written consent of the Government (p.14). None of the information collected will be revealed under the Freedom of Information Act (p.54).
  • The contract will allow up to 100 council tax inspectors at a time to concurrently log into the Rightmove database, and up to 500 registered users to have access (p.39).
  • The contract was explicitly approved by Ministers (pp.49, 50) and by the Council Tax Revaluation Programme Board (p.52).
  • The Data Protection Act does not apply to this data about homes, provided the names of the householders are removed (p.30). Yet the Valuation Office Agency will use this data to increase the tax bills of those homes, as councils – who will  issue the bills – hold the names and addresses of each council taxpayer.

Revaluation by stealth exposed

The document reveals why this information is wanted: for revaluation purposes:

“Although there are these uncertainties around the finer detail, the programme has been established so as to fulfil the statutory requirements placed on the Valuation Office Agency’s listing officers, namely to revalue all English properties at the AVD [antecedent valuation date] and then to map the values into banding regime once it is know… In order to carry out the revaluation more effectively and efficiently the VOA are developing Automated Valuation Models (AVMs) to assist the valuation work on 22m properties” (Agreement between HMRC and Rightmove, p.27).

“Domestic property needs: The property records at VOA at an individual level include:

  1. Group – Architectural and design style of property
  2. Type – Semi-detached, detached, flat etc
  3. Age – approximate year of build
  4. Area – total floor area of the dwelling (external for houses, internal for flats)
  5. Heating – central heating/other
  6. Rooms – how many in total
  7. Bedrooms – how many in total
  8. Bathrooms – how many in total
  9. Floors/lowest floor level – number of floors for houses or lowest floor level of flat
  10. Parking – what is provided?
  11. Conservatory – yes/no
  12. Conservatory Area – area of the conservatory
  13. Outbuildings – substantial buildings such as stables etc
  14. Photograph – external and potentially internal photographs (important for sold properties)” (p.28)

The fact that all this information is collected and logged by the council tax inspectors, is confirmed by the internal manuals of the council tax inspectors, who draw up detailed charts of all these features to log in their controversial new property database.

Valuation Office Agency, CTR(E) IA 180705 – Sales Validation – ‘Rightmove’ Data, Appendix 5 – Management Information Record (Electronic).

“The Valuation Office Agency (VOA) has been tasked with re-valuing the entirety of England’s housing stock for the purpose of updating property council tax bands. The VOA will use an Automated Valuation Model (AVM) which will utilise a database of 22m properties” (Agreement between HMRC and Rightmove, p.36).

“[The Rightmove solution] No limit to geographical region within England that can be searched by the VOA. No limit to the number of searches that the VOA can perform” (p.37).

“Each property record [held by the Rightmove database] typically includes:

  • One of more photographs of the property
  • The number of bedrooms
  • The style of the property
  • The asking price (either sale or rental)
  • The range of dates during which it has been on the live website
  • Property particularly which may include the layout, style and condition of the property.”

By December 2007, Rightmove expect to offer each month a rolling selection of 3.3 million properties on the market at that time, rising to 3.5 million properties in March 2008 (p.43). Each property record will be worth a cost of £5.12. Properties requiring more information will then be inspected internally by the Valuation Office Agency inspectors (p.47).